Are some vehicles exempt from Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) emissions regulations, specifically in the case of the W208

A place for open-ended discussion on any car-related topic.
jameswright77
Moderator
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 5:35 pm

Greetings, individuals. I am now experiencing difficulty comprehending the underlying factors contributing to the situation at hand. The Mercedes CLK 430 in my possession is indicating that it is subject to ULEZ charges. However, when comparing it to other models of the same year available for sale, it seems that they are not required to pay such taxes. What is the reason for the potential liability of mining operations using the same engine, while other mining operations are not subject to such liability?
I am seeking suggestions about the topic of private licence plates. I am perplexed by the discrepancy in exemption status for the same vehicle in different scenarios.
generic_user2
Moderator
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 8:20 pm

A general guideline is that if your vehicle is registered as a "Y" or later, it is likely to be acceptable. If your vehicle is registered as "X" Reg or older, you may encounter difficulties.
jameswright77
Moderator
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 5:35 pm

Thank you for your response, poormansporsche. It is evident that the situation is somewhat perplexing, and it seems that my ability to persuade others is limited.
STAR89colin
Moderator
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:20 pm

It is advisable to exercise caution about the use of private plates. In my personal experience, while affixing my private plate, it erroneously indicated that Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) taxes were applicable.

I initiated communication with Transport for London (TFL) and received a written correspondence from Mercedes affirming that the vehicle in question is indeed Euro6 compliant. This letter was then sent to TFL. In addition, I have provided the papers pertaining to my yellow automobile. Transport for London (TFL) subsequently made modifications to their system in order to accurately record my vehicle's number plate information.
jameswright77
Moderator
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 5:35 pm

Thank you very much!
I apologise for the inquiry, but would you happen to possess the contact information for Mercedes? It would be advantageous for me to explore this avenue.
I express my gratitude one again.
STAR89colin
Moderator
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:20 pm

0800 3777 7777 or +44(0) 207 660 9991
jameswright77
Moderator
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 5:35 pm

Thank you very much!
Martin_Smith76
Senior
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:40 pm

I own a 2001 S320 CDI and a 2001 CLK230K, both of which adhere to the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) regulations.
aston_martin76
Junior
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue May 12, 2020 5:45 pm

Both the W211 320 CDI (07) and the W208 320 (99) models do not meet the requirements for Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) compliance. I engage in nightly supplication to various deities, expressing my fervent hope that the aforementioned situation does not include the M25.

In addition, I own a Honda XR400 motorcycle that also exhibits deficiencies, resulting in a total of three vehicles that are collectively unsatisfactory.
Samantha_Jones83
Senior
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:30 pm

While this guideline is often followed, it would be advisable to contact the MB homologation department to get confirmation on emissions levels, particularly Nox levels. If they can provide specific information indicating that the Nox levels are below 0.15g/km, it would be possible to request TFL to classify the vehicle as ULEZ compliant.

Although Mercedes-Benz does not possess this data for many Euro 2 petrol vehicles, it is worth considering vehicles like the one mentioned on the original poster that were produced outside the transition period (early 2001).

The matter at hand is to Mercedes, who were proactive in addressing emissions concerns. However, during the Euro 2 era, there was no obligatory need to meticulously document emission levels, which therefore renders them non-compliant with ULEZ standards by default. It is important to acknowledge that there is a possibility that they may really demonstrate compliance.

Given the sensitive nature of this topic, it is unfortunate that we are faced with the possibility of failure. However, our only recourse is to express our dissent via formal channels such as the official consultation and other petitions.
Post Reply