JustCarsForum - Your Ultimate Automotive Community

Since my previous interaction on this site, I have had persistent issues with my automobile. It has required many visits to the workshop for the repair and replacement of the swirl flaps, which incurred a significant financial burden. Although the vehicle initially exhibited satisfactory performance after the repair, it subsequently resumed exhibiting symptoms such as juddering and intermittent power loss, particularly at low engine speeds and during acceleration. The exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system was changed, resulting in the subsequent restoration of the car's functionality, although with a satisfactory but not exceptional performance, which persisted for a limited duration of several days. The scanner consistently displays a continuous code, which sometimes triggers the automobile to enter a restricted performance mode and illuminates a warning light with the code 14CF00. I have conducted a visual inspection and performed gentle tugging manoeuvres in order to identify any damaged wires. As a non-expert in electrical systems, my approach has been based on a process of trial and error. I attempted to use an alternative exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system as a precautionary measure, although encountered identical outcomes. Today, I proceeded to remove the cover from the turbo actuator. Upon inspection, the actuator seemed to be sufficiently clean and devoid of any noticeable signs of wear. I proceeded to cleanse it expeditiously using contact cleaner, and thereafter applied a small amount of high temperature grease to the gear mechanism. After doing a test drive of the vehicle, I had a sense of excitement as I saw an improvement in its performance. However, upon my return, I observed a recurrence of the surging and bucking issues. The diagnostic code shown on the vehicle's system was once again 14CF00. Do you believe it would be advantageous to experiment with a novel actuator? Could this code perhaps be the source of the surging and bucking at low revolutions per minute (RPM)? I am now facing a predicament whereby I have exhausted all potential courses of action that I believe are within my capabilities. The financial burden associated with the substantial expense of replacing the swirl flap renders the garage unaffordable. Consequently, the actuator represents my last recourse for rectifying the issue.

Any guidance or recommendations would be much appreciated. Expressing gratitude is a common social convention that is often used to acknowledge and appreciate the actions or assistance provided by others.

I would be very inclined to experiment with an air mass metre, namely the batwing model. A test is conducted in the Star system to modify the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve, with the objective of observing the air mass reaction within a predetermined range. If the value falls beyond the specified range, the error code will be triggered. It is advisable to exercise caution when considering the purchase of inexpensive batwings from online platforms such as eBay, since my personal experience has consistently yielded unsatisfactory results. Performing a swap with a component from a vehicle that is known to be in excellent working condition is considered a dependable method of testing.

That proposal seems to be a viable course of action. I performed maintenance on the mass airflow (MAF) sensors and upon inspecting the actuator, I will endeavour to get a replacement. I appreciate your prompt response.

What are the perspectives on an unutilized connector?
This phenomenon seems to deviate from the norm in my perspective.
Is it possible that the source of it may be located under the batwing? Are there two connectors?
Alternatively, may the subject of discussion be the swirl flap motor?

Greetings, Thank you for your response. I apologise for the lack of higher quality images. The wire and plug in question were found concealed beneath the wiring harness, characterised by a shiny black appearance. It was necessary to extract the wire and plug from this location. Despite conducting a thorough search of the surrounding area, no corresponding socket was identified, leading to the assumption that the wire and plug were intended for a feature not present in my vehicle. Notably, the batwing component of my vehicle contains two Maf plugs and an orange pipe plug, but no additional sockets. The plug in question was situated beneath the batwing.

I was able to get a loan of the batwing from a vehicle of comparable age. Regrettably, after initially exhibiting significant improvement, it subsequently reverted back to experiencing surging and bucking. The endeavour is deemed worthy due to its potential for success, and it has effectively eliminated a possibility, which is advantageous. I express my gratitude for your assistance.

The relevance and potential significance of the following observation is uncertain: while replacing the batwing yesterday, an indistinct yet consistent beeping sound was detected emanating from the engine. This auditory stimulus, characterised by a series of repetitive beeps, was relatively low in volume and not perceptible within the interior of the vehicle. The precise origin of this sound could not be determined, leading to speculation that a potential disconnection of a component may be the cause.

I have encountered instances when I have experienced the consequences of your error on several occasions.

Are you installing authentic EGR valves? If not, it is imperative that you do so. The inexpensive products available for purchase are deemed ineffective due to their limited durability and functionality. The product is now experiencing a backorder situation, which has persisted for an extended period of time. Consequently, we are currently devising a strategy to manage this situation.
The typical cause for this error is an obstructed EGR pipe or a malfunctioning throttle flap. The presence of metal EGR pipes located at the front of the engine might lead to the accumulation of soot, resulting in a limp mode or error code. Remove the throttle flap and pipes, and thoroughly cleanse them. Resetting all of the adaptation data, namely the HFM drift correction in the Xentry diag actuations menu.

This contribution is anticipated to be beneficial.

I sincerely value the provided information and guidance. The EGR component in question is a refurbished Wahler part. However, the subsequent portion of your response surpasses my current comprehension. I lack knowledge regarding the location of the EGR pipe in the front and the throttle flap. As it is currently nighttime, I will examine these components tomorrow and attempt to ascertain their configuration and feasibility for intervention. I express my sincere gratitude.

The decision was made to revert to the initial state, whereby the original Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system was cleaned and reinstalled. This installation was successfully accomplished, hence resolving the issue of coolant leakage that had persisted in earlier endeavours. I was unable to locate the pipe as recommended by BlackC55. Consequently, I proceeded to reset the 14CF00 code and embarked on a drive. The vehicle exhibited satisfactory performance, with no warning indicators illuminated, thus indicating a noticeable improvement compared to its former condition. Upon conducting a diagnostic check using a code reader, no error codes were detected. However, after approximately thirty minutes of driving, the vehicle began to exhibit symptoms reminiscent of its previous state. Specifically, while driving, there is a sensation similar to lightly applying the brakes, reminiscent of the time when the car was equipped with an anti-lock braking system (ABS). This phenomenon is highly bothersome and significantly impairs the drivability of the vehicle. Subsequent Upon further examination, it seems that there is no presence of the 14CF00 code or warning light during the code reading process. This observation may indicate that the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (ERG) system is really faulty, as previously mentioned. It is worth noting that the code required to order a replacement actuator is not visible, perhaps necessitating the removal of the actuator for identification. This additional step in the diagnostic process might be considered inconvenient. In conclusion, this serves as my latest progress report, although a little advancement.Greetings