JustCarsForum - Your Ultimate Automotive Community

I am contemplating the purchase of a CX-3. May I request your valuable comment on the provided material? Are there anyone who possess both the CX-3 and CX-5 models and can provide insights or information?

The Cx3 has reduced dimensions, resulting in less leg room and boot capacity. The smaller footprint of the vehicle does not provide the same level of stability as the cx5.

The CX-3 also has a prominent protrusion on the dashboard.

It is unexpected that the stability of the subject in question is not as robust as anticipated. Is the riding height lower, however?

The wheelbase and track dimensions are reduced in size.

The MX-3 has superior fuel efficiency, although at the expense of reduced acceleration. This particular vehicle model is more suitable for urban environments and those in the younger age group, as opposed to middle-aged individuals who mostly engage in highway driving.

Is there a noticeable protrusion on the dashboard?

Indeed, it seems that the horsepower and torque figures are lower in comparison to those of the 2.5L engine. It would be advantageous if this vehicle were equipped with a turbocharged engine. The vehicle would engage in competition with other contenders under the "hot hatches" category.

I had the opportunity to examine the CX-3 model at the Auto Expo held in Raleigh, North Carolina. The size of the object in question may be considered insufficient for those in the middle-aged demographic.
However, this particular option is most suitable for adolescents and romantic partners without children. In order to do a comparison, I examined a Toyota CH-R, and it became evident that the backseat was unsatisfactory from the outset.

I apologise for the confusion, but based on my understanding, it seems that there may have been a typographical error in your previous communication. It seemed that you mentioned owning a CX-5, but I wanted to confirm whether you intended to refer to a CX-3 instead.